Texas Corporation Takes Legal Action Against Berkshire Hathaway

News Summary

GD Group Inc. has filed a lawsuit against Berkshire Hathaway Direct Insurance Company, alleging mishandling of their property insurance. The lawsuit arises from a water damage incident at GD Group’s Seguin property. They claim inadequate investigation and wrongful policy rescission, leading to significant financial losses. As GD Group seeks to recover damages, the implications of this case could reshape commercial property insurance practices in Texas.

San Antonio Business Takes Legal Action Against Berkshire Hathaway

In a clash that has caught the attention of the Texas business community, GD Group Inc., a Texas-based corporation, has filed a lawsuit against Berkshire Hathaway Direct Insurance Company, alleging serious missteps in handling its commercial property insurance policy. This lawsuit, which was officially filed on September 25, 2025, in federal court in San Antonio, revolves around a water damage incident that occurred at GD Group’s Seguin property back in August 2024.

The Incident That Started It All

It was on August 8, 2024, when GD Group faced a major setback due to a ruptured sprinkler system that caused significant water damage. Following this unfortunate event, GD Group filed a claim with Berkshire Hathaway, only to be thrown into a whirlwind of confusion surrounding their insurance coverage. Initially, their claim was acknowledged and assigned to an adjuster named Raj Shipwal, along with assistant David Yoon from Engle Martin, who began the investigation process.

The Claim Investigation Journey

On October 29, 2024, GD Group was informed that their claim was still under investigation. Although the inspection revealed extensive damage, the timeline took a dramatic turn when, after months of waiting, GD Group was shocked to receive a notification on February 3, 2025. The notice stated that Berkshire Hathaway had rescinded the insurance policy, citing alleged “material misrepresentation during the policy application process.” This abrupt decision left GD Group out in the cold – without the necessary coverage – and, as a result, facing escalating financial losses.

The Aftermath of Rescission

Even more bewildering was the fact that, despite being informed about the policy cancellation, GD Group received a refund for their premiums. The company’s insurance agent had previously ensured that the application was meticulously filled out and complete, leading GD Group to express confusion regarding this sudden termination. Their attempts to clarify the situation with Berkshire Hathaway proved fruitless. Each overture seemed to be met with a stone wall of refusal to engage in dialogue about the dispute.

A Growing Financial Burden

While the claim dispute brewed, GD Group encountered further distress as their property continued to deteriorate, resulting in a closure that translated to lost income. To get a handle on the mounting issues, they enlisted the help of Mutual Group Inc. to assess the damage. The estimated repair costs skyrocketed to over $1.2 million, with business income losses calculated at approximately $474,000 and content losses exceeding $2.6 million. This hefty price tag was then presented to Berkshire Hathaway along with a pre-suit notice on May 30, 2025.

The Allegations Against Berkshire Hathaway

In their lawsuit, GD Group has detailed accusations against Berkshire Hathaway, alleging bad faith, breach of contract, and **_deceptive insurance practices._** The complaint argues that the insurer’s investigation into the claim was inadequate and that timely explanations regarding the denial of the claim were sorely lacking, constituting blatant violations of Texas insurance law.

What Lies Ahead for GD Group

As of now, GD Group seeks not just to reclaim actual damages and policy proceeds but also aims for treble damages, interest, and attorney fees. The pushback from Berkshire Hathaway identified in a response from their attorney cites GD Group’s history of three business claims in three years, which they assert were misrepresented during the application process. Importantly, GD Group’s policy remains unpaid, with the company facing ongoing harm from being named as a defendant in a related lawsuit concerning the unresolved repairs.

The Broader Implications

The likely outcome of this unfolding case could have far-reaching implications for how insurers approach rescission and claims investigations in the commercial property sector. For businesses throughout Texas, the resolution of this dispute could set important precedents in the realm of insurance coverage for commercial property.

As the situation develops, it remains essential to keep an eye on this case, where the stakes are high and the future is uncertain. For GD Group, navigating through these troubled waters will require careful strategy and persistence.

Deeper Dive: News & Info About This Topic

• Insurance Business
• ValuePenguin
• U.S. News: Homeowners Insurance in Texas
• Fox26 Houston
• Houston Chronicle
• Wikipedia: Insurance Law
• Google Search: Insurance Claims Denials
• Google Scholar: Insurance Coverage Rescind
• Encyclopedia Britannica: Insurance
• Google News: Insurance Disputes